Skip to content

Editorial policy

Last updated 2026-08-09. Publisher: Novus Stream Solutions.

How the Novus Stream Solutions Editorial Team reviews, sources, corrects, and updates Novus Visualizers guidance.

Novus Stream Solutions Editorial Team

The Novus Stream Solutions Editorial Team maintains Novus Visualizers product guidance by checking claims against the current browser implementation, the live engine catalogue, reproducible local tests, primary Web Audio and Canvas documentation, and the dated product changelog. The byline identifies the responsible team; it does not invent a named expert or professional credential.

Author identity

Articles carry the byline Novus Team. That byline is represented as a Person in structured data, working for Novus Stream Solutions. It is the editorial team, not a fabricated named expert or a credential we cannot substantiate.

Review before publication

Product and workflow claims are checked against the current application, catalogues, tests, and representative browser-local output before publication.

  • Visualizer behaviour is sourced first to the live engine catalogue, draw registry, and the editors that read those contracts.
  • Limits, fallbacks and unsupported cases are published beside capabilities rather than hidden in release notes.
  • A green automated test is evidence for the behaviour it exercises, not proof of every quality or accessibility outcome.

Corrections

Readers can report a specific statement, route, source, or reproducible result that appears wrong or stale.

  • Correction requests go to visualizers@novusstreamsolutions.com; article links pre-fill the page title and URL.
  • Confirmed errors are corrected at source so page copy, metadata, search, RSS, and LLM output do not preserve competing versions.
  • A substantive correction earns a real updated date; formatting-only edits do not manufacture freshness.

AI assistance

AI may assist outlining, code review, test generation, or draft editing, but it is not treated as a source or an accountable author.

  • A human-directed review checks generated claims against the repository, current output, and primary sources before publication.
  • AI-generated citations, measurements, credentials, quotations, and product behaviour are rejected unless independently verified.
  • Accountability remains with the Novus Stream Solutions Editorial Team shown in the byline.

Primary sources

Technical, platform, standards, and API claims prefer the organization that owns the specification or implementation.

  • Product behaviour is sourced first to the current code, registries, fixtures, tests, and measured output.
  • External facts prefer official Web Audio, Canvas, and related platform documentation, standards bodies, and original research.
  • Third-party summaries may provide context but do not replace a primary source for a precise or time-sensitive requirement.

Freshness and revision dates

Published and updated dates describe real editorial events and are shared by the visible article, metadata, schema, sitemap, and RSS feed.

  • An updated date is recorded only after a substantive revision to the article body or a correction that changes meaning.
  • Time-sensitive platform guidance is reviewed against current official documentation before its date is advanced.
  • Superseded routes use permanent redirects; a moved article does not remain published in full at two self-canonical URLs.

Topic clusters and pillars

Product-technical articles remain self-canonical on this domain. The explainer cluster uses two existing pillars (the glossary and the engine reference) rather than inventing a third hub. Other Novus properties may summarize these articles; they must not republish the full text under a competing canonical URL.

Request a correction

Include the page URL, the exact statement, and a primary source or reproducible result where possible. Email visualizers@novusstreamsolutions.com. Confirmed substantive corrections receive a real modified date.